|
||
2022 m. Lietuvos šaškių kompozicijų (100) sudarymo čempionatas
2022 m. Lietuvos šaškių kompozicijų (100) čempionatas
Etiudų-100 skyrius. Papildomos pastabos
E07:
There is a small omission in
variant B: (32-37), 2-13(36), 3(41), 36(47),
41, 13 +.
By the way this had no influence on the score given by me.
Besides I
composed two endings on the
same position (dia A) – both
never published !
A
B
C
Black moves, white wins
Diagram B (14-07-2010):
11(29A), 3933, 2(12BCD), 24(32EF), 42(17G),
24 (21), 9Z, 26(38), 48 +.
A
(9), 12(31a), 22(36/37), 31, 8(31), 3(28A1),
26(36), 37 +.
A1
(36), 14(29), 32/37/46 +.
B
(10), 47, 36(32), 4(24H), 10(38), 15(42/43), 47/49 +.
C
(32), 42 +.
D
(9), 42/47, 15 +.
E
(43), 9, 49 +.
F
(10), 5(43), 38 +.
G
(18), 15(37), 1410(41), 47 +.
H
(23), 15(28J), 42 +.
J
(37), 10(29), 41/46(33), 32(39), 49 +.
Z
2?(9), 3(38), 26(43), 30(49Y) =.
Y
(48?), 25 +.
a
(32) and now 22 etc. +
or 16(37), 32, 8(29), 3(2933), 17, 50 +.
Diagram C (13-07-2010):
(36A), 42, 2(12BCD), 24(32EF), 42(17G), 24
(21), 9Z, 26(38), 48 +.
A
(32), 42(9), 12(36), 4137, 1(46A1), 37, 23 +.
A1
(47), 38, 23 +.
E08:
I didn’t know the ML 1992 mini-ending to which Mr. V. Bieliauskas
refers! Variant
G with impurity 32/46 not
compositional: variant A
already has the impurity 5/9-4 !
E15:
Author’s solution not complete, because the variant 48(37AB), 23(21),
41/46(47), 19, 1930, 26 is surely worth to be defined.
E17:
No solution after 2(25), 35(26), 8(28) =
E18:
small deepening (JBas 25-03-2022)
3(23A), 47, 42(19B),
15(23), 20(37C), 14(29),
41/46(33), 32(39), 49 +.
A
(22), 21 P.Rimsa 2022:
(37D), 41/46(42), 37,
26(36), 37 +.
B
(20), 15(37), 47 +.
C
(28), 42 +.
D
(27), 17(33), 39(37), 41/46(42), 37, 28 +.
Johan Bastiaannet |
Copyright © 2008-2022 LŠKMS. Visos teisės saugomos. E-Mail: Administrator